Walking down the
hallway to my public school’s auditorium as a young seventh-grader, I could
hardly contain my glee. We had an
assembly, a very rare and very exciting event, mainly because we got to miss
multiple periods of class. My frivolity
abruptly stopped as an unassuming, middle aged man walked on the stage of the
auditorium with tears in his eyes and introduced himself. His name was John Halligan, and his son,
Ryan, had recently taken his life in response to bullying after a false rumor
was spread in his school that he was gay.
At the same time, 1,500 miles away in Minnesota’s Anoka-Hennepin school district, parents just like Halligan were grieving over the loss of their children whose lives were cut short by the same toxic bullying Ryan had endured. In the course of two years (2009-2011), nine students in this Minnesotan school district committed suicide. All of the deceased students either identified as members of the LGBTQ community or were perceived to be queer, and therefore bullied by their peers at school. At one school in the district, a boy was called “fag” by three kids and assaulted in the hallway of school, as a teacher looked on and did nothing to stop the violence. A middle schooler reported to the principal that multiple boys urinated on him in the public restroom. The principal responded that it was probably just water.
At the same time, 1,500 miles away in Minnesota’s Anoka-Hennepin school district, parents just like Halligan were grieving over the loss of their children whose lives were cut short by the same toxic bullying Ryan had endured. In the course of two years (2009-2011), nine students in this Minnesotan school district committed suicide. All of the deceased students either identified as members of the LGBTQ community or were perceived to be queer, and therefore bullied by their peers at school. At one school in the district, a boy was called “fag” by three kids and assaulted in the hallway of school, as a teacher looked on and did nothing to stop the violence. A middle schooler reported to the principal that multiple boys urinated on him in the public restroom. The principal responded that it was probably just water.
How could these
adults, these people expected to lead and exemplify good behavior, let these
horrendous attacks happen without consequence?
The school district, before and through 2011, had in place a strict “neutrality
policy” regarding sexual orientation and gender identity. This policy declared that all teachers had to
remain absolutely neutral on the topic of sexual orientation. And, in my opinion, what this policy stated was fair enough – when teachers
discuss religion or politics, for example, they are expected to remain neutral
on these topics. But the neutrality
policy in action was a different story. It obliterated any sort of safe space for students
identifying as LGBTQ. It provided no
help or guidance to students grappling with their sexual orientations or gender
identities. And it gave the teachers
permission to ignore any sort of bullying directed at the queer population.
In February of
2012, the district repealed the policy after the Southern Poverty Law Center
and National Center for Lesbian Rights filed a lawsuit at the school district
on the policy. The school instated a new
policy. Although still requesting
neutrality from teachers on the subjects of gender identity and sexual orientation,
this new policy allows open discussion of these topics, presented factually by the
teachers. This change gives students a
safe space to voice their opinions and personal beliefs, if found appropriate
to the subject. The school district also
instituted an anti-bullying task force.
Win, right?
Wrong. One of the adults on the board, Bryan
Lindquist, is vehemently anti-gay, promoting “gay therapy” and leading an
anti-gay hate group called “Parents Action League.” So, the school district allowed a man aggressively
anti-gay on the anti-bullying committee created solely for the protection of
all students who identified as queer. To
me, it seems as if the district lacked any sort of commitment to actually
protecting the rights of LGBTQ students.
Their change in policy seems more like a response to the legal action
against the school than a genuine concern for this population. Nine lives were lost, nine lives. Is that number still
not large enough for the school to feel the need to implement real protection
for their students?
Recently hearing
this news, I was brought back to my seventh-grade assembly. The town where I lived was tiny and I didn’t
know anyone who openly identified as anything other than a cisgender
heterosexual, but even in this extremely homogenous town, my school found it necessary
to dedicate a rare assembly to focusing on the struggles of teens who are
bullied for their perceived sexual orientations or gender identities. Studies have
found that between 30-40% of teens identifying as LGBTQ have tried to commit
suicide at least once in their life. And
I truly believe that most important way we can reduce these numbers is by
adding curriculum on the LGBTQ community to every single school system so that
those who don’t understand and bully in response can be enlightened, and the
LGBTQ youth can have guidance and acceptance in at least one of their formative
environments.
-- Zoe Meyers
No comments:
Post a Comment